Hypermill review
“We’re very pleased to launch 2019.1 hyperMILL®,” said Alan Levine, Managing Director of OPEN MIND Technologies USA, Inc. See related videos for comprehensive details on the new functions in hyperMILL® 2019.1. hyperMILL® 2019.1 has a range of new features and enhancements including an expanded Finishing Module in the hyperMILL® MAXX Machining Performance Package, process optimizations such as a new thread milling module, a new function for reducing calculation times, tool database flexibility, and CAD optimization.
HYPERMILL REVIEW SOFTWARE
(February 1, 2019) – OPEN MIND Technologies AG, a leading developer of CAD/CAM software solutions worldwide, has introduced hyperMILL® 2019.1, a new version of its advanced, comprehensive CAD/CAM software suite. Original Press Release: New Hypermill® 2019.1 CAD/CAM Suite Offers Expanded Finishing Capabilities, Process Optimizations and More Introduces 5-axis Prismatic fillet finishing function in hyperMILL® MAXX machining that enables the geometry and automatic inclination of barrel cutters.Includes process optimizations such as new thread milling module, a new function for reducing calculation times and tool database flexibility.Offers expanded finishing module in machining performance package and CAD optimization.The post What is Quality? appeared first on Martin’s Rubber Company. One thing is clear however only through continual improvement can a company ensure it keeps abreast of changes in process and customer expectation and ensure it maintains its reputation for quality. The real change that Martin’s Rubber has witnessed has been the level of expectation on what is perceived to be good enough to meet requirements, as manufacturing processes have improved through the implementation of quality systems as well as the development of technology (which drove which, of course, is another debate entirely), the expectation on what is acceptable has increased. As with other criteria, there are national and international standards in place for rubber and allied products that set out proven levels of acceptability in variation, of both dimensional variables and physical attributes, that can aid this process. However, it is essential then to ensure that you (and indeed the customer) understand the expectations for the product, and can therefore assure that the product proposed does indeed meet the requirements. To ensure conformance, you must first understand and communicate the limitations of your products and services, or you will fail at the initial contract review stage if this exercise does not take place then you will not be able to determine whether your proposed product will actually meet the customers’ requirements. It was Phillip Crosby who said that “quality is the conformance to requirements”, and understanding the subtleties of this statement is what truly defines quality to the individual and, most importantly as a manufacturer, what “quality” actually means to any given customer, which cannot be assumed. Ideals relating to ‘right first time’, ‘quality = results of work effort ÷ total cost’ and the ‘plan, do, check, act cycle’, whilst old, are still relevant today. How does a service rate its quality? There may be no tangible variables to be measured and no physical result to review?.Does a cost effective “value” product have the same right to be classed a quality product as a “premium” product might have?.Is it right that manufacturers design products with a life to ensure that they need replacing after an approximate amount of usage?.Is it good enough to say a product that is “fit for purpose” is therefore is a “Quality” product, or should the product not only meet but exceed expectation to truly be deemed of “Quality”?.Even before the early days of Juran and Deming, the question “What is Quality” and therefore what makes a “quality” product has raged on.